[Updated] On January 1, 2020, a new law went into effect in California that re-classifies many independent contractors as employees. California Assembly Bill 5 in combination with CA Labor Code 2802 could mean that your company must now reimburse contractors for their vehicle expenses. Update: In November of 2021, voters passed Proposition 22, which exempted some workers from AB5.
On September 18, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a bill designed to codify a previous court decision relating to the definition of "independent contractor vs. employee." California Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5), which went into effect January 1, 2020, created a new three-part test based on the CA Supreme Court's decision in the case Dynamex Operations West, Inc. vs. Superior Court of Los Angeles.
Under the Dynamex ABC test, a contractor who does not meet all of the following three criteria must now be considered an employee.
While there are a number of exceptions, such as for physicians, lawyers, engineers, and freelance writers, a large number of workers in California must now be treated as employees not only for the purposes of wages but business reimbursements as well. In November of 2021, voters passed Proposition 22, which exempted app-based food delivery workers and rideshare drivers from being considered employees (e.g. Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, and GrubHub drivers).
If your company employs independent contractors who must operate vehicles as part of their work, you may now be responsible to reimburse them for vehicle expenses. CA Labor Code, Section 2802(a) already requires businesses to reimburse California employees for "all reasonable costs" incurred while conducting duties on behalf of the employer. These costs include the expense of both owning and operating a vehicle.
Now that most independent contractors are now considered employees, it follows that the companies for which they work must reimburse them for the same business expenses covered under Section 2802 of the labor code.
In fact, the reimbursement of vehicle expenses factored heavily in the original Dynamex class action suit that triggered the new law. In 2004, Dynamex, a same-day courier and delivery service, re-classified its drivers as independent contractors instead of employees. They were now responsible to cover their own vehicle expenses, such as fuel, maintenance, insurance, tolls, and more.
When two drivers sued the company, alleging that they were wrongly classified as contractors, the California Supreme Court sided with them, resulting in what's now called the Dynamex ABC test – the three-part test now added by Assembly Bill 5 to the California labor code.
Here are three steps your company should take in response to Assembly Bill 5 if you operate in the state of California.
If your company currently has independent contractors, it is imperative that you determine whether they are now considered employees under California law. Seeking legal counsel may be necessary to make these determinations, especially with the many exemptions in place and a spate of lawsuits seeking further clarification of the law. Make sure to determine whether Proposition 22 exempted any of your workers, keeping them contractors rather than employees.
If your contractors operate a personal vehicle for work, you will likely need to begin reimbursing them fully for that vehicle, along with other business expenses. If you have any employees that are not being reimbursed for business vehicle expenses, then you need to reimburse them in order to comply with CA Labor Code 2802. That will apply to any contractors now re-classified as employees.
Choosing an appropriate vehicle reimbursement method can be a challenge. To comply with California labor law, you need a quantifiable reimbursement method that you can prove covers all employee vehicle costs. Let's look at two options: reimbursement using the IRS mileage rate and FAVR reimbursement.
Many California employers use the IRS standard business mileage rate to reimburse employees for the use of personal vehicles. The IRS business rate for 2021 is 56 cents per mile. This rate has generally been considered compliant with the labor code.
However, a number of problems exist with reimbursements using the IRS standard rate (aka the federal rate). For an in-depth analysis, read Employers Are Questioning the IRS Mileage Rate and Top 3 Reasons NOT to Use the IRS Mileage Rate.
Here is a summary of the problems with using the IRS rate for California vehicle reimbursements:
Let's look at the best alternative: FAVR reimbursement.
We recommend using the fixed and variable rate reimbursement to comply with the combination of California Assembly Bill 5 and Labor Code 2802. This approach to vehicle reimbursement tailors the reimbursements to specific employees using vehicle expense data relative to their geographic location – perfect for a state with volatile costs like California.
To learn more about this transparent, defensible, and geographically-sensitive reimbursement method, read our guide to FAVR reimbursement.